jump to navigation

HIMSS11 – An Uber Perspective February 20, 2011

Posted by gonzalezloumiet in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
2 comments

My name is Eduardo Gonzalez Loumiet and I am the Managing Director at Uber Operations. For the next few days, I will be posting and Tweeting from HIMSS11 in Orlando Florida.

Also, if you too are attending HIMSS11, please feel free to contact me if you would like to meet-up and grab some coffee. I can be reached at: eddie@uberops.com or @gonzalezloumiet.

-Regards,
Eduardo

Day 1 – Sunday, February 20, 2011

HIMSS Latino Initiative Workgroup Kick Off

My participation in HIMSS11 started off with an exciting event, kicking off the newly formed HIMSS Latino Initiative Workgroup. The event, organized by Luis Belen from Medic Success and Danny Vargas from VarCom, was standing room only. Some of the speakers and panelists were:

  • Dr. David Hunt, Chief Medical Officer, ONC for Health IT
  • Commander David Dietz, Office of Minority Health
  • Marcia Thomas-Brown, Program Manager for the National Health IT Collaborative for the Underserved
  • Dr. Joxel Garcia, President, Ponce School of Medicine, Puerto Rico REC
  • H. Stephen Lieber, HIMSS President/CEO

The evening was spent with Brian Ramos of ThinkCreative and Shane Molinari of MTS. We spoke about innovation in health IT, medical banking,  and healthcare business strategy.

More pictures can be found here.


Day 2 – Monday, February 21, 2011

The day started off at 8am by listening to 3 E-Sessions provided by HIMSS. They were a quick (30mins each) way to learn about a topic. The sessions were:

  • E-Session on Ascension Health EMR demo by AllScripts
  • E-Session on Integrated IT Strategic Planning in Tough Economic Times
  • E-Session on Successfully selecting and integrating with an EHR.

I then attended my first session, A Project Manager’s Guide To Integration Projects. The Department of Clinical Research Informatics at NIH-CC has successfully implemented multiple interfaces between applications. They shared some of their lessons learned like dealing with technical and business project sponsors. Also, Ryan shared some advice on messages flow documentation and why project managers should know “some” HL7.

Speakers: Susan Houston and Ryan Kennedy

The slides were quite good and they can be found here: http://www.himssconference.org/docs/sphandouts/4.pdf

I spent the rest of the day walking through the exhibit halls. I met with several organizations like Orion (Uber Operations strategic partner) and AllScripts, one of the most popular EHR solution providers in the nation.

With John Dunn from Orion

More pictures can be found here.

Here is a video of my tour of the Exhibit Hall.

Day 3 – Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Day 3 started off with a session titled: Public Health: Electronic Lab Reporting readiness for Responding To “Meaningful Use”. The topic focused what the public health system must have to improve population health as part of the national health reform.
The speakers were:

Doug Hamaker, Texas Dept of State Health Services, NEDSS Coordinator
(note, the Texas Dept of State Health Services is a client of Uber Operations)
-
Stephen Macauley, Product Manager, CSC
-
Slides can be found here: : http://www.himssconference.org/docs/sphandouts/75.pd
I then went to the Career Services area where you have a dozen universities offering Masters and Certificates in Health IT, like Colombia University.  It was also a good place to meet folks that are looking for careers in Health IT. There was also a session on Project Management and best practices, which I thoroughly enjoyed.  I like when the speaker said: “Project Managers get work done through other people”.
I then met folks at the HIMSS Social Media Center, where one can Tweet and share news on the HIMSS Facebook page.
.
Its 6:40pm, just got back from the HIMSS11 5K Social Network Run, which was a blast. Met several leaders in the industry and burned off some of the convention food. I am now off to meet with the Derrick Taveras, President and CEO of Tactical Management, a wonderful company out of Florida, focusing on physician practices and Medicare Advantage Health Plans.

——————–

Day 4 – Wednesday, February 23, 2011

The day started off with talks by Health and Human Services Secretary, Sebelius and ONC leader Dr Blumenthal. Also, HIMSS announced stats from their Annual Report, like having 31,000 members and having a net income of 2.5 million.

Kathleen Sebelius

I then attended a workshop titled: CDC Informatics: Building Value at Public Health – Health Care Interface.

The rest of the afternoon was spent meeting with several people/orgs like:

  • Clearwave
  • MedicSuccess
  • National Health Information Technology for the Underserved (NHIT)
  • Tactical Management
  • Former NBA player, entrepreneur

 

 

Guest Post: Playing Games with ONC Certification February 15, 2011

Posted by gonzalezloumiet in EMR, Health Care, HIT, Technology.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

(This is a guest post from our friends at Software Advice.)

By: Houston Neal Houston Neal
Director of Marketing at Software Advice
(513)364-0117
houston@softwareadvice.com

“Certified” is the $44,000 buzzword prefixing electronic health records (EHR) software. To qualify for Health Information Technology for Economic and Clincal Health (HITECH) Act incentive payments, you must use an EHR that is certified by the government. Additionally, you must use a system – or systems – that offer 100% of the functional and security capabilities required to meet “Meaningful Use” criteria.

Many EHR vendors are promoting their products as “certified,” but the claim can be misleading. There are three ways they could lead you astray:

Alternative Certifications
Before the HITECH Act, two organizations certified medical software:

  • Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) - CCHIT began certifying EHR software in 2006. Since then they have released 10 certification programs for ambulatory and inpatient EHRs.
  • KLAS – KLAS is a private organization that has gathered ratings on EHRs since 1997. Every year they rank EHR vendors and bestow a “Best in KLAS” award on the top 20.

In an effort to stand out from the other 300+ EHR systems on the market, vendors widely promote their CCHIT or KLAS credentials. They may even tack the word “certified” onto their CCHIT or KLAS approved product. This muddies the water for providers. They have to distinguish between CCHIT, KLAS and certification from an ONC-Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB). While CCHIT and KLAS are meaningful credentials, they’re not the certifications that qualify for incentive funds.

This is especially confusing because CCHIT is now one of six organizations approved to certify EHRs for the HITECH Act. So, if an EHR vendor claims they have CCHIT certification, you’ll need to clarify which one. Is it ONC-ATCB certification, or one of CCHIT’s independent credentials?

Complete EHR vs EHR Module
Software vendors can receive ONC-ATCB certification for a complete EHR or an EHR module. This means a product doesn’t need to meet all criteria for Meaningful Use – instead, it can be partially certified if one or more functions meet a subset of requirements. For example, a vendor could certify their e-prescribing application or their patient portal.

This under-publicized detail could cost you thousands of dollars; by itself, a certified EHR module won’t make you eligible for incentive payments. You must use two or more modular EHRs that, combined, meet 100% of the ONC criteria. So while vendors can officially promote a module as having ONC-ATCB certification, it may fall short of making you eligible.

Guaranteed Incentive Payments
Be mindful of guaranteed incentive payments. It is reasonable for a vendor to guarantee they’ll meet certification criteria. In fact, you might make it a requirement in your purchase decision.

However, guaranteeing incentive payments is altogether different. Technology alone won’t make you eligible. EHRs are just a means to an end. Ultimately, you are responsible for achieving Meaningful Use status. So be wary of this type of guarantee. Read the fine print and find out how you are reimbursed if you don’t qualify for incentive payments. Does the vendor reimburse you the full amount of lost incentive payments? Or do you just get reimbursed for the cost of the software? You shouldn’t purchase a system based on this guarantee alone.

Five Key Questions to Ask Vendors
To help you avoid these pitfalls, we put together a list of 5 questions to ask vendors. Answering these will put you in a good position to become eligible for incentive payments.

  1. Which certification does the EHR have: CCHIT, KLAS or ONC-ATCB? You must use an EHR that is ONC-ATCB certified in order to be eligible for incentive payments.
  2. Which product version has been certified? Ask the vendor for complete details of their ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification, including: product name and version, date certified, unique product identification number, the criteria for which they are certified, and the clinical quality measures for which they were tested.
  3. Does the vendor have certification for a complete EHR or an EHR module? If module, you will need to use more than one to be eligible for incentive payments. The ONC has created a handy website that allows you to build a list of EHR modules that meet 100% of ONC criteria.
  4. Will the vendor resubmit their EHR for final certification in 2012? The current certification is temporary and only lasts through 2011. Make sure your vendor has plans to reapply in 2012, and find out if they will certify a complete EHR or just a module.
  5. Are you purchasing through a reseller or other business partner that renamed the product? If so, make sure the renamed product has been approved by the ONC-ATCB. Even if it is the same version with identical features and functionality, it won’t make their Certified HIT Products List unless the original vendor reports it to an ONC-ATCB.

Read more: Playing Games with ONC Certification.



Uber Ops To Lead Florida In PHLIP ETOR Salmonella Project February 12, 2011

Posted by gonzalezloumiet in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, APHL, Data Integration, Health Care, HIT, Interoperability.
2 comments

February 12, 2011 – Tallahassee, Florida – The Uber Operations team will be leading the Florida Department of Health in the Public Health Laboratory Interoperability Project (PHLIP) – Electronic Test Order & Result (ETOR) Salmonella project.

The ETOR Salmonella project will facilitate the orders of Salmonella tests by a state public health agency/lab to the CDC. The test order will flow through the CDC Public Health Laboratory Interoperability Solutions and Solution Architecture (PHLISSA) infrastructure. Once the test is resulted in the CDC’s Laboratory Information Management System, Starlims, the result message will flow out through PHLISSA and back to the state public health agency/lab. The Florida RnR Hub will have a key role as the states will use this for message transport facilitation. Other states involved in the project are Iowa and Utah. The project is sponsored by the Association of Public Health Laboratories.

The project kicked off this past week. We look forward to leading Florida and will update this blog post as we progress throughout the year.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.